The many measures taken certainly allow the country to remain at a much better level of resilience than other countries. However, recent figures show that we will have to continue to be careful especially with regard to deconfinement, because there is a risk that if this is not done well we will be brought back to the starting point, which would be even more damaging for our economy which is already taking many hits. We maintain that deconfinement must be done with caution, with sanitary measures that must be taken to avoid any risk of new peaks of contamination. We analyzed the Wikipedia data from July 08, 2020, broken down by country to make our proposal [2] [3]. The difference observed in the recovery rate of patients suffering from COVID-19 in the different countries can be explained by the efficiency of the health system which is the most important factor. Our ranking is based on the recovery rate (rate per thousand of the number of cases cured) by country from the source data obtained on COVID-19 available on Wikipedia. Thus according to this index which is weighted by the mortality rate, the best country is the one with the high recovery rate (close to 1000) and a low mortality rate. It is also an indicator of the health performance of the various countries in terms of resilience to SARS-CoV2 and should allow each country to use it to adjust its deconfinement policy. Countries with a low rate of recovered cases (less than 500) must be extremely vigilant in the measures to be put in place during deconfinement to increase this rate gradually. Good performance is achieved when the measures taken allow a country to approach 1000 turns by reducing its mortality rate. IFED proposes to carry out this ranking once a week and invites you to consult our site for updates.